They have it listed on their website, it's also gonna be different for every one cause not everyone lives in the same area, have the same barometric pressure, altitude or run them at the same speed. You need to conduct your own tests.Needing to know the BC for the 18gn JSB to enter into a ballistic calculator.
Neither barometric pressure nor altitude will have any effect on BC if it is calculated correctly, as all atmospheric conditions should be corrected to standard atmosphere conditions. BC should not change significantly with speed either if the correct reference drag law is used, such as GA2 in the MERO Easy BC calculator.They have it listed on their website, it's also gonna be different for every one cause not everyone lives in the same area, have the same barometric pressure, altitude or run them at the same speed. You need to conduct your own tests.
Well the reason I say altitude is because anither one of our members has a 1:18 liner fir his .177 but the projectiles he is using are shooting as if they were being shot from the correct being being a 1:16 saying that may be due to the altitude. But thank you for that useful information, I'm not looking to spread incorrect infoNeither barometric pressure nor altitude will have any effect on BC if it is calculated correctly, as all atmospheric conditions should be corrected to standard atmosphere conditions. BC should not change significantly with speed either if the correct reference drag law is used, such as GA2 in the MERO Easy BC calculator.
G1 is not the correct reference drag law for pellets, particularly at high speeds. It is a pity some manufacturers continue to use it when they should know better.
That would be me. What I said is that, using slugs, as air density decreases with altitude, less spin is needed to achieve a certain stability factor. Therefore, at my elevation, calculations show that I can get the same stability factor for my 20g 177 slugs using a 1:18 liner, as I could using a 1:16 liner at sea level.Well the reason I say altitude is because anither one of our members has a 1:18 liner fir his .177 but the projectiles he is using are shooting as if they were being shot from the correct being being a 1:16 saying that may be due to the altitude. But thank you for that useful information, I'm not looking to spread incorrect info
I gotcha, I wasn't gonna name drop from the get go. I was under the impression that the bc would change with different variable like slugs would, not entirely why but thank you for clearing that up!That would be me. What I said is that, using slugs, as air density decreases with altitude, less spin is needed to achieve a certain stability factor. Therefore, at my elevation, calculations show that I can get the same stability factor for my 20g 177 slugs using a 1:18 liner, as I could using a 1:16 liner at sea level.
As for pellets, while BC is constant and corrected for standard conditions, any given pellet (or slug) will experience less reduction in speed (and therefore also drop) per unit distance as altitude increases. That’s because less dense air provides less resistance and drag.
Here’s something that you could read when it’s too dark to see those lizards:I gotcha, I wasn't gonna name drop from the get go. I was under the impression that the bc would change with different variable like slugs would, not entirely why but thank you for clearing that up!
Kenny,I can tell you from personal experience that both bullets from a firearm and pellets and slugs from an air rifle have BC values that will most definitely be affected by changes in elevation. I shoot and hunt primarily in two different areas. One is roughly 1500 feet elevation and the other varies from 7500-8500 feet. I determine my own BC values by measuring velocity drop at various distance. There is a significant increase in the measured BC value of a projectile when going up from 1500ft to 8500ft.
Kenny
Yes. I can see it from that point of view as well.Kenny,
You are correct, but it is anathema to ballisticians to state that a BC can change in such a way because BC values are constants derived from calculations or empirical validations that utilize standardized atmospheric conditions (sea level, 70F). The point here is that BCs need to be standardized so that they are comparative. If that notion was abandoned, manufacturers could conduct tests on the top of Mt McKinley and hoodwink the consumer. It’s certainly accurate to state that “an increase in temperature and/or elevation acts to effectively increase the BC of a projectile”
Thank you!Here’s something that you could read when it’s too dark to see those lizards:
![]()
Effects of Altitude and Temperature on Rifling Twist - Lilja
In an earlier article in NBRSA NEWS, we looked at the effect changing atmospheric conditions had on the ballistic coefficient of a bullet. To summarize briefly we found that the ballistic coefficient of a bullet as published by bullet manufacturers and others is valid only for a standard...riflebarrels.com
It is akin to what we see with hp and torque values of engines. The manufacturers claims comport to standard atmospheric conditions to facilitate comparison. However, at 10k feet, you have <70% of that hp with a NA engine.Maybe a better way to say it is that each projectile has a form factor. That form factor is indeed constant. The BC value is the relationship of that form factor to the ever changing environmental conditions. So while the projectile’s form factor doesn’t change the BC value does.
Kenny