Other Epic Airguns TWO 0.22 300mm Rifle w/ Folding Stock 1st Impressions

[Here's the TL;DR summary: very nice/solid rifle, built like a tank with excellent craftsmanship but heavy. First two shorts after sitting unused are basically useless. Too soon to tell if it'll be a long-term keeper...]

Hello AGN,

I went and did what I swore to myself that I would not do anymore: I got a first run release of a new rifle. Doing this has typically not turned out well in the past but there's been so few new rifles to pique my interest over the last year, I got tired of buying more Impacts & Leshiy 2's over and over again. This boredom wore me down this month and I picked up the newly released Epic TWO in 0.22 with the short 300mm barrel, aluminum air tube and folding stock. Since it got here on Monday, I've been staring at it and occasionally fondling it but only got the chance to sight it in today and put a few magazines through it. Here are my initial impressions of this rifle (please note that the titanium endcap and Saber Tactical grip are only two non-factory parts shown on this rifle):

LIKES:

+Craftsmanship: this rifle is extremely well built using high quality components and feels really solid. The shroud is actual carbon fiber and looks great.

+Simplicity of design: the main components are milled from a solid block of aluminum so unlike the Impact M3, there are a minimal number of screws bolting the different parts together. In fact, the only screws you can readily see on the action are the 3 on the underside that attach the trigger guard to the action, 1 that attaches the cocking bolt to the cocking arm, 1 on the safety and 2 that attaches the retention clip for the folding stock. There are a couple others like the 1 inside the grip that can't be seen - but overall, it's a very clean, uncluttered look unlike the M3 which has bolts and screws everywhere you look.

+I assume this simplicity also applies to the number of o-rings as well but can't confirm as of yet because no owner's manual or schematics are currently available for this rifle.

+The folding stock is awesome but perhaps too robust? The main portion of the factory stock is also milled out of a single piece of aluminum and adds the ability to adjust the cheek rest, butt plate for length of pull and even a bag rider. When folded, it locks securely into the retention clip located on the left side of the trigger guard in front of the trigger. Very well designed stock that's probably thicker and heavier than it needs to be - but given that to add this type of adjustability on the Impact, you're looking at spending $200-$400 for aftermarket parts, this is a welcomed addition to this rifle.

+When folded, this rifle is only 20.5" long . . . which, in theory, could make it a portable backpack rifle but it doesn't have a chance to replace my Leshiy 2 for this purpose because it is noticeably heavier while getting fewer shots per fill.

+Decent shot capacity despite a very small air tube on the 300mm model. At 850-860fps (with regulator set at 100bar), I got exactly 3 full magazines (33 shots) from a 250bar fill down to 100bar in the tube. The TWO can be filled up to 300bar so you could probably get another mag out of it if you fill to that level but that's not practical for me to do on a regular basis so I measure from 250bar down. That's a fraction of what I get out of my FX bottle rifles but not shabby given how short/small this airtube is.

+The safety has indicators on both sides of the rifle. The main safety switch is on the right side of the rifle but there is an indicator that sits flush to the left side of the action that shows you the status of the rifle as well. This circular indicator has a notch in it that is also black (like pretty much everything else on this rifle) - it would be more useful to have some paintfill in that notch so that you can more easily see where it's pointing.

+Accuracy: this Epic TWO is as accurate as I expected it to be, which is 5 shots making one ragged dime sized hole at 40yds. It's too small a sample size to make a final assessment but it appears to be as accurate as my well tuned M3's at this range.

DISLIKES:

-The biggest and most obvious flaw with this rifle is that, if you let it sit unused for a couple of hours, the first two shots after that are at a much lower fps and basically useless. When I shot this rifle for the very first time (just taking it out of the box without a scope or anything), I was super impressed because it was nearly silent! Come to find out that this is only because the first shot after non-use is significantly lower and therefore quieter (POI was a good 5-6" lower than normal). The 2nd shot gets a little better but still low; by the 3rd shot, you're back to your normal fps and POI. For reference, this rifle is set to shoot 0.22 15.89g Hades pellets at around 850-860fps. The first shot after non-use didn't even register and the second shot was 812fps before getting back up to normal on the 3rd/4th shot. I'm told this has to do with the balanced valve but I don't know enough about that to explain it here - the main takeaway is that this is completely unacceptable for a hunting rifle b/c you're not likely going to have to chance to fire off two throw-away shots before you can finally aim that third one at your target b/c that squirrel will be long gone by then!

I'm used to either my Impacts or Leshiys shooting the first shot a little high or a little low but those are only 0.5" to 1" off from where I'm aiming and could be adjusted for. The first shot on the TWO is so noticeably lower/slower that is even sounds significantly different - which says a lot! It literally sounds like a different gun altogether on that first shot, as if it's broken.

-The magazine: I've been spoiled by the Impact magazine for its uber high capacity but also by the availability of the STUD speedloading system that allows me to reload in mere seconds. The Epic magazine "only" has 11 shots in 0.22 but you also have to load each pellet one by one and there doesn't appear to be a way to create a speedloader for it. On the plus side, the mag is very deep to allow for taller slugs but with pellets (depending on the skirt of each pellet), some will fall right through to the bottom and almost disappear into the mag while others barely fully make it into the mag and sit high on the filling side. I don't think that having the pellets sit at different depths in the mag will actually affect accuracy since they ultimately get loaded one at a time into the barrel anyways, but the OCD part of me is bothered psychologically by that! ;)

-The worst part of the magazine is that there is no last shot indicator so you have to actually keep track of how many shots you've fired. On other mags, you won't be able to cock the rifle once you've shot the last pellet because the mag indexes to a point in the mag that prevents the pellet probe from closing. With the Epic magazine, the last slot remains open so you can cock and fire the rifle as normal once you've run out of pellets. I wasted one shot on each magazine going past #11 because I wasn't mentally keeping track; with a small air tube with limited capacity as it is, wasting a shot on each magazine is less than ideal. To fix, I'll have to mark or paint the magazine like I did with my Edgun Matador mags to have a last shot indicator.

-The weight: this rifle is heavy for its size. With the Hawke Frontier 18540 (1.5lb) scope on it (and no moderator), this TWO weighs in at just over 9lb 14oz. I did swap out the factory grip for the heavier ST aluminum grip and also added a small scope level but the weight gain there is minimal. As mentioned before, the stock is very beefy and could probably be trimmed down in some places to save weight. For comparison: the 500mm FDE Impact 0.22 shown in the photos below has the larger 580cc bottle, heavier 1.9lb scope and just about every aftermarket accessory I want for it and weighs in a 11lb 2oz.

-The anodizing, while it is uniform and feels nice to the touch, isn't as durable as some others. I've already noticed some light marks/wear to the finish on the trigger guard from putting the rifle on my tripod and the magazine well has a couple of nicks from the normal insertion & removal of the magazine. This doesn't seem to bode well for the long term wear on this rifle.

-The trigger guard is ARCA only with a t-slot for a picatinny rail (not provided). While I appreciate the ARCA slot for my tripods, I often use a picatinny bipod so would need to add a picatinny rail to do that. Also, since the guard prefers to slide into the tripod ARCA mount from the front (tip) of the rifle, if you install a picatinny rail into the t-slot, you would need to remove it each time you want to use the ARCA slots. You can try to open up your ARCA mount all the way out and drop the trigger guard down into it but this is an clunky, imprecise approach and it was in trying to do just that that resulted in the rub marks in the anodizing on the rail.

-The cocking bolt could be better; it is also made out of aluminum but is too small and looks like it's plastic. It is the cheapest looking part on this entire rifle but luckily, I think can have a bigger/better one made by a fellow forum member here for a relatively low price.

-The main air gauge is in the my least favorite place for it, forcing you to stare down the barrel to see the gauge. I realize for a tube gun, this is the cleanest place of it but I would trade some of the clean lines on this rifle to not have to look into the barrel each time I need to check pressure.

-The TWO is louder than my Impacts, but that is to be expected given the shorter 300mm barrel compared to the 500mm Impact. Using the same moderator, the 500mm Impact shoots the 0.22 Hades at 900fps whereas the TWO shoots them at 850-860fps but is still louder

SUMMARY (SO FAR): Will this Epic TWO replace my M3 as my main 0.22 shooter? Unlikely. Can it earn a long-term spot in the safe? Maybe. The main issue at this time is the low first two shots - if they can't fix that somehow in the near future, I'm not realistically going to want to own a rifle for the long run where I have to remember to waste the first two shots (out a total of only 33 per fill) each time I pick it up to shoot.

Here are some photos next to my other rifles for reference:
Two1.jpg
two2.jpg
two3.jpg
two3b.jpg
two4.jpg
two4b.jpg
two5.jpg
two5b.jpg
two6.jpg
two7.jpg
two8.jpg
two9.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yen, hope all's well! At what distance have you been shooting the TWO? What's it like at 100+ yards? Slug accuracy? (Or have you tried slugs yet? )
Gerry
Hey Gerry, I can only shoot out to 50 yds in my yard and have only shot about 4 mags total out of this rifle so can't report on anything beyond this distance yet. I also have no intention of making this a slug rifle because the short barrel and small air tube means I'll probably get like 10 usable shots if I set it up to shoot slugs at the velocity they like to be shot at. I played around with slugs on my longer (700mm) Impacts and, while it's super cool, I don't need that much power or range. My rifles just need to be able to easily and consistently take out any squirrels that show up on the property out to 50yds.

Hope all's well in SD and hope you have a happy holidays!
 
Hey Gerry, I can only shoot out to 50 yds in my yard and have only shot about 4 mags total out of this rifle so can't report on anything beyond this distance yet. I also have no intention of making this a slug rifle because the short barrel and small air tube means I'll probably get like 10 usable shots if I set it up to shoot slugs at the velocity they like to be shot at. I played around with slugs on my longer (700mm) Impacts and, while it's super cool, I don't need that much power or range. My rifles just need to be able to easily and consistently take out any squirrels that show up on the property out to 50yds.

Hope all's well in SD and hope you have a happy holidays!
👌 🙂👌
 
  • Like
Reactions: yenniedn
Yen, great write up on an highly anticipated PCP, and, thank you for being a first run guinea pig, just kidding 🤗! I have a JSAR Raptor with a balanced valve, balanced valves can get stiction, especially after sitting, and shooting at lower speeds this is usually more evident. I believe they are made for higher power shooting as the valves close very very easily. If you try tuning it for higher power, that stiction might be less as you are hitting the valve harder. Tuning can be a very methodical operation. It is a gorgeous rifle for sure and I do hope it meets or exceeds your expectations over time!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pan60 and yenniedn
Yen, great write up on an highly anticipated PCP, and, thank you for being a first run guinea pig, just kidding 🤗! I have a JSAR Raptor with a balanced valve, balanced valves can get stiction, especially after sitting, and shooting at lower speeds this is usually more evident. I believe they are made for higher power shooting as the valves close very very easily. If you try tuning it for higher power, that stiction might be less as you are hitting the valve harder. Tuning can be a very methodical operation. It is a gorgeous rifle for sure and I do hope it meets or exceeds your expectations over time!
Thanks for the info...I will try to bring it up to about 920fps (which is typically the high end for where I shoot my 0.22's) and see if it helps with that first/second shot. Hopefully I won't lose too many shots per fill at that higher speed but it would be a worthwhile tradeoff because those first two shots are laughable as is.

Thanks for sharing, not many in folks hands just yet.
What can you tell us about the trigger?
Hey Lewis, haven't played with the enough to come up with an opinion on the trigger yet but I'm not a trigger snob and my reference points are the typically the M3 trigger, which aren't that great anyways (the other trigger I use most often is the Leshiy 2 which is in its on class of wonky). I'll mess around with it some more this weekend and report back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranchibi
Awesome write up! I will be looking for a smaller hunting/hiking setup eventually. When I saw the Epic Two yesterday it went on my list. But with 30-40 shots it should be lighter, and no first shot consistency is a total deal breaker. I am probably going to end up listing my M3 for that reason alone.

So your L2 is off speed on first shot as well? Did I read that right? Back when I had mine I did not have a chrono and was just very new to PCPs. I've never measured bullet speed. But at 20 yards I did not notice any POI shift at first shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yenniedn
Thanks for the info! Hope you get that first and second shot figured out! I've been holding back on the 177 700mm version. Think I will put a few rifles up on the classifieds to fund that one soon. Have you been able to contact Epic or the retailer you purchased from about the low fps on shot 1 and 2? Please let us know what you come up with!
 
  • Like
Reactions: yenniedn
Sorry guys, I literally haven't touched the Epic TWO since I did this write-up - nothing personal against this rifle, I just haven't done much shooting lately. To reply to the posts since then:

Great write up! It is ashame about the first few shots. That really destroys a gun if you are hunting or competing with it. Have you found a length of time that the rifle needs to sit before the rifle needs the warm up shots?
It only takes a few hours between shots to see this first shot issue; it doesn't even have to sit overnight for this to happen.

Awesome write up! I will be looking for a smaller hunting/hiking setup eventually. When I saw the Epic Two yesterday it went on my list. But with 30-40 shots it should be lighter, and no first shot consistency is a total deal breaker. I am probably going to end up listing my M3 for that reason alone.

So your L2 is off speed on first shot as well? Did I read that right? Back when I had mine I did not have a chrono and was just very new to PCPs. I've never measured bullet speed. But at 20 yards I did not notice any POI shift at first shot.
Yes, depending on the particular Leshiy 2 or M3, there can be some POI shift on just the first shot BUT those were very minor and could be adjusted for if needed. The newer regs on both of these rifles have mostly resolved this issue so I don't really have to think about it when I pull any of my M3's or L2's out of the safe after sitting for weeks (sometimes months) and worry about missing when I put the crosshairs on a squirrel.

Appearance wise, that is a thing of beauty.
Yes, it is undoubtedly a great looking rifle with some very nice features.

Thanks for the info! Hope you get that first and second shot figured out! I've been holding back on the 177 700mm version. Think I will put a few rifles up on the classifieds to fund that one soon. Have you been able to contact Epic or the retailer you purchased from about the low fps on shot 1 and 2? Please let us know what you come up with!
I'm sure they'll figure something out to help or even eliminate this issue down the line. This is one of the main reasons why I don't typically buy the first run of anything anymore because inevitably there are kinks that need to be ironed out. The M3's and Leshiy 2's that I love now had plenty of issues/quirks when they were first released. I have not contacted Epic because it's a low priority for me but I'll likely loan it to a local friend that knows a lot more about tinkering with these things than I do to see what he finds out about improving the 1st/2nd shots.

Thanks for confirming my initial suspicion when I saw their videos. Very nice looking, very nicely made but NOT for me. Weight alone is a deal killer plus a few other details. Thank you for helping me love and appreciate my Impact compact and DTC even more while saving me cool 2k to try it.
You're welcome! ;) This Epic would never replace my Impact 0.22 even without the 1st/2nd shot issue b/c of the noticeably lower shot count; I'm not a fan of having to refill after every shooting session.

I think the low first shot is just the nature of the beast with balanced valves. Seems to be a common complaint with the new RTI and FX balanced valves.
If this issue is inherent on all balanced valves and can't be noticeably improved, they shouldn't use it nor ever release a rifle where this is a known issue that people have to live with or somehow overcome. It is a significant flaw for a hunting rifle with a limited air/shot capacity.

Great write up and insights on your Epic 2… It is a good looking, burly little PCP, I like it.
Yes, if/when they fix the 1st/2nd shot issue, it'll be a great option for a lot of people. As is, it will prevent just about every hunter or backyard varminter from buying it.
 
I'll second the other reply re: stiction - you just need to find the sweet spot with hammer spring tension/preload.

I had to do this with a build using a Don Cothran balanced valve - it took a little while, but worth the time invested.

And thank you for your time you spent on this post - a good, informative read - SALUTE!
 
[Here's the TL;DR summary: very nice/solid rifle, built like a tank with excellent craftsmanship but heavy. First two shorts after sitting unused are basically useless. Too soon to tell if it'll be a long-term keeper...]

Hello AGN,

I went and did what I swore to myself that I would not do anymore: I got a first run release of a new rifle. Doing this has typically not turned out well in the past but there's been so few new rifles to pique my interest over the last year, I got tired of buying more Impacts & Leshiy 2's over and over again. This boredom wore me down this month and I picked up the newly released Epic TWO in 0.22 with the short 300mm barrel, aluminum air tube and folding stock. Since it got here on Monday, I've been staring at it and occasionally fondling it but only got the chance to sight it in today and put a few magazines through it. Here are my initial impressions of this rifle (please note that the titanium endcap and Saber Tactical grip are only two non-factory parts shown on this rifle):

LIKES:

+Craftsmanship: this rifle is extremely well built using high quality components and feels really solid. The shroud is actual carbon fiber and looks great.

+Simplicity of design: the main components are milled from a solid block of aluminum so unlike the Impact M3, there are a minimal number of screws bolting the different parts together. In fact, the only screws you can readily see on the action are the 3 on the underside that attach the trigger guard to the action, 1 that attaches the cocking bolt to the cocking arm, 1 on the safety and 2 that attaches the retention clip for the folding stock. There are a couple others like the 1 inside the grip that can't be seen - but overall, it's a very clean, uncluttered look unlike the M3 which has bolts and screws everywhere you look.

+I assume this simplicity also applies to the number of o-rings as well but can't confirm as of yet because no owner's manual or schematics are currently available for this rifle.

+The folding stock is awesome but perhaps too robust? The main portion of the factory stock is also milled out of a single piece of aluminum and adds the ability to adjust the cheek rest, butt plate for length of pull and even a bag rider. When folded, it locks securely into the retention clip located on the left side of the trigger guard in front of the trigger. Very well designed stock that's probably thicker and heavier than it needs to be - but given that to add this type of adjustability on the Impact, you're looking at spending $200-$400 for aftermarket parts, this is a welcomed addition to this rifle.

+When folded, this rifle is only 20.5" long . . . which, in theory, could make it a portable backpack rifle but it doesn't have a chance to replace my Leshiy 2 for this purpose because it is noticeably heavier while getting fewer shots per fill.

+Decent shot capacity despite a very small air tube on the 300mm model. At 850-860fps (with regulator set at 100bar), I got exactly 3 full magazines (33 shots) from a 250bar fill down to 100bar in the tube. The TWO can be filled up to 300bar so you could probably get another mag out of it if you fill to that level but that's not practical for me to do on a regular basis so I measure from 250bar down. That's a fraction of what I get out of my FX bottle rifles but not shabby given how short/small this airtube is.

+The safety has indicators on both sides of the rifle. The main safety switch is on the right side of the rifle but there is an indicator that sits flush to the left side of the action that shows you the status of the rifle as well. This circular indicator has a notch in it that is also black (like pretty much everything else on this rifle) - it would be more useful to have some paintfill in that notch so that you can more easily see where it's pointing.

+Accuracy: this Epic TWO is as accurate as I expected it to be, which is 5 shots making one ragged dime sized hole at 40yds. It's too small a sample size to make a final assessment but it appears to be as accurate as my well tuned M3's at this range.

DISLIKES:

-The biggest and most obvious flaw with this rifle is that, if you let it sit unused for a couple of hours, the first two shots after that are at a much lower fps and basically useless. When I shot this rifle for the very first time (just taking it out of the box without a scope or anything), I was super impressed because it was nearly silent! Come to find out that this is only because the first shot after non-use is significantly lower and therefore quieter (POI was a good 5-6" lower than normal). The 2nd shot gets a little better but still low; by the 3rd shot, you're back to your normal fps and POI. For reference, this rifle is set to shoot 0.22 15.89g Hades pellets at around 850-860fps. The first shot after non-use didn't even register and the second shot was 812fps before getting back up to normal on the 3rd/4th shot. I'm told this has to do with the balanced valve but I don't know enough about that to explain it here - the main takeaway is that this is completely unacceptable for a hunting rifle b/c you're not likely going to have to chance to fire off two throw-away shots before you can finally aim that third one at your target b/c that squirrel will be long gone by then!

I'm used to either my Impacts or Leshiys shooting the first shot a little high or a little low but those are only 0.5" to 1" off from where I'm aiming and could be adjusted for. The first shot on the TWO is so noticeably lower/slower that is even sounds significantly different - which says a lot! It literally sounds like a different gun altogether on that first shot, as if it's broken.

-The magazine: I've been spoiled by the Impact magazine for its uber high capacity but also by the availability of the STUD speedloading system that allows me to reload in mere seconds. The Epic magazine "only" has 11 shots in 0.22 but you also have to load each pellet one by one and there doesn't appear to be a way to create a speedloader for it. On the plus side, the mag is very deep to allow for taller slugs but with pellets (depending on the skirt of each pellet), some will fall right through to the bottom and almost disappear into the mag while others barely fully make it into the mag and sit high on the filling side. I don't think that having the pellets sit at different depths in the mag will actually affect accuracy since they ultimately get loaded one at a time into the barrel anyways, but the OCD part of me is bothered psychologically by that! ;)

-The worst part of the magazine is that there is no last shot indicator so you have to actually keep track of how many shots you've fired. On other mags, you won't be able to cock the rifle once you've shot the last pellet because the mag indexes to a point in the mag that prevents the pellet probe from closing. With the Epic magazine, the last slot remains open so you can cock and fire the rifle as normal once you've run out of pellets. I wasted one shot on each magazine going past #11 because I wasn't mentally keeping track; with a small air tube with limited capacity as it is, wasting a shot on each magazine is less than ideal. To fix, I'll have to mark or paint the magazine like I did with my Edgun Matador mags to have a last shot indicator.

-The weight: this rifle is heavy for its size. With the Hawke Frontier 18540 (1.5lb) scope on it (and no moderator), this TWO weighs in at just over 9lb 14oz. I did swap out the factory grip for the heavier ST aluminum grip and also added a small scope level but the weight gain there is minimal. As mentioned before, the stock is very beefy and could probably be trimmed down in some places to save weight. For comparison: the 500mm FDE Impact 0.22 shown in the photos below has the larger 580cc bottle, heavier 1.9lb scope and just about every aftermarket accessory I want for it and weighs in a 11lb 2oz.

-The anodizing, while it is uniform and feels nice to the touch, isn't as durable as some others. I've already noticed some light marks/wear to the finish on the trigger guard from putting the rifle on my tripod and the magazine well has a couple of nicks from the normal insertion & removal of the magazine. This doesn't seem to bode well for the long term wear on this rifle.

-The trigger guard is ARCA only with a t-slot for a picatinny rail (not provided). While I appreciate the ARCA slot for my tripods, I often use a picatinny bipod so would need to add a picatinny rail to do that. Also, since the guard prefers to slide into the tripod ARCA mount from the front (tip) of the rifle, if you install a picatinny rail into the t-slot, you would need to remove it each time you want to use the ARCA slots. You can try to open up your ARCA mount all the way out and drop the trigger guard down into it but this is an clunky, imprecise approach and it was in trying to do just that that resulted in the rub marks in the anodizing on the rail.

-The cocking bolt could be better; it is also made out of aluminum but is too small and looks like it's plastic. It is the cheapest looking part on this entire rifle but luckily, I think can have a bigger/better one made by a fellow forum member here for a relatively low price.

-The main air gauge is in the my least favorite place for it, forcing you to stare down the barrel to see the gauge. I realize for a tube gun, this is the cleanest place of it but I would trade some of the clean lines on this rifle to not have to look into the barrel each time I need to check pressure.

-The TWO is louder than my Impacts, but that is to be expected given the shorter 300mm barrel compared to the 500mm Impact. Using the same moderator, the 500mm Impact shoots the 0.22 Hades at 900fps whereas the TWO shoots them at 850-860fps but is still louder

SUMMARY (SO FAR): Will this Epic TWO replace my M3 as my main 0.22 shooter? Unlikely. Can it earn a long-term spot in the safe? Maybe. The main issue at this time is the low first two shots - if they can't fix that somehow in the near future, I'm not realistically going to want to own a rifle for the long run where I have to remember to waste the first two shots (out a total of only 33 per fill) each time I pick it up to shoot.

Here are some photos next to my other rifles for reference:
View attachment 417702View attachment 417704View attachment 417701View attachment 417703View attachment 417700View attachment 417706View attachment 417707View attachment 417708View attachment 417705View attachment 417709View attachment 417710View attachment 417711
How far out can you shoot withe red dot on your Edgun?
 
How far out can you shoot withe red dot on your Edgun?
I can confidently shoot a ground squirrel out to 40yds and hit it most of the time unless something weird happens. Most of the squirrels that show up in my yard are between 30-40yds and putting the crosshairs from an M3 w/ 25x scope on the squirrel's head to decide which hair on it's head I want to blow off has gotten kind of boring. With the red shot, at least there's a chance that I might miss so it's a little more challenging and forces me to focus a little more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dairyboy