Scope Decision Guide: "You can't always get what you want!" —— Scope Performance Triangle #1

When I shop for anything, I WANT IT ALL!!❗
E.g.: I want a full size SUV,
that gets at least 40 miles a gallon,
that I can drive at high velocities through steep turns in our crazy city of 11.000,
and that drives at least 300.000 miles without any major problems,
and costs under $20.000 new.

You laugh.
I cry.
When I buy a car.
And when I buy scopes.


BECAUSE:
You can't always get what you want!


➠ I need to decide on my priorities when buying a scope.
Because I can't always get:
➊ High magnification, and
➋ Wide field of view, and
➌ Compactness (light, short).




🔴 The following diagram illustrates this and can help you weigh your own priorities — in order to make a better scope purchase — a sort of scope purchase decision guide (for these 3 aspects only).


If you increase 1 of the 3 scope characteristics mentioned above, the other 2 will diminish....



❓ What questions do you have?
How can I improve this? 😊

Matthias


❌ Attachment:
Scope Performance Triangle #1



SCOPE Triangle 1 – to Balance High Magnification + Wide Field of View + Compactness (Light+Sho...jpg
 
Oh boy! My head is spinning, thankfully at the practical for me, sub 60 yards pesting and plinking that I do? The majority of budget price scopes suit. No need for to overly analyze what’s practical in practice, as opposed to in theory.
Mine, too! I just ordered a light weight Maven yesterday, not in love with the reticle, but like you, pesting 25-60 yds should be good enough.
 
Personally the most bang for buck in optics for my elr shooting needs is translated in either an element titan 3-18 or a vector continental 3-18 with around 44mils for 600eur and clear glass. There are better off course but a lot pricier.
Paired with a good bc slug you got a toy to reach from 20 to around 800yds.

Best value glass alone i have tried was from every vector optic i tried.
Minotaur
Continental
Some cheaper low mag ones

Personally i have found difference only in sharpness/smoothness wich is a personal taste side by side with a theos/continental in a cloudy afternoon comparing at same magnification.
Being the theos is more smooth and continental more sharp. Not pulling opinions just giving mine while always taking price in consideration.

Thank you for the hard work on your list it served me well previously.

Cheers
 
  • Like
Reactions: JungleShooter
What the sheet doesn't tell you is that of those 60 mils you can use about 25 in good focus and without losing quality greatly.


Yes, Ignoto, that is a good point! 👍🏼

We just discussed the optical disadvantages of short scopes (with a high magnification ratio) on another thread.



● Whenever I can coax my computer to allow me to use CorelDraw again (🤦🏻‍♂️) I will add that information to my Scope Performance Triangle. 👍🏼

Matthias
 
I notice that most of the scopes I see on the airgun websites are not the names I recognize from the choices I made from my powder burning rifles. I was not familiar with Hawke, UTG, Mantis, etc. I plan on getting a break barrel spring piston model so the spring action must shake the scope.


Yes! That is hugely important for a springer gas-piston airgun — a scope that can withstand the harsh double recoil.

When you're getting ready for scope shopping, ask the forum which brands and models are spriner approved (and fulfill some of your other requirements).

Matthias 👍🏼
 
  • Like
Reactions: drjjpdc78