12 pounds 12.7 ounces lol, unless you're planning on using a bipod or rest forgettaboutit.
unless you're strong as %$@#.
How do you like that vector? I was looking at their scopes for my other texan and that's the magnification I was looking at.Pump action Hatsan at-44 Long weighs in at 11.8lbs with a vector veyron 3-12x44![]()
One thing some people don't consider is that positioning of weight plays a big role. Forward weight will be a bigger struggle than rearward weight. The most extended arm used to stabilize the barrel will have less work to do if a gun is rear heavy vs front heavyTexan CF 50 cal with bipod and pulsar: 10lb 12oz, 2 pounds makes a big difference!
Yes! I tried putting the thermion on my seneca repeater .25... lol. It was so far forward I couldn't hold the gun up more than a couple minutes before my left arm was ready to give out.One thing some people don't consider is that positioning of weight plays a big role. Forward weight will be a bigger struggle than rearward weight. The most extended arm used to stabilize the barrel will have less work to do if a gun is rear heavy vs front heavy
@elittle1234 This thread is on point! I’m currently working with my setup and I intend to do some tripod work. I’ll try spot-and-stalk with a bipod since I put a sling on my Rattler, but I expect to get tired of carrying it relatively quickly.I was hoping to use the rattler for spot and stalk type hunting, but the weight is crazy. I'm thinking maybe a QD mount so I can keep it in a pack then mount it in a hurry if I need it
I think that one of the biggest factors really comes into play with bullpups, and it's something that has largely been overlooked. Once rifles start to become very tall in terms of the distance from the base of the pistol grip to the top of the optics, they begin to have unusual handling. We're used to thinking of the balance point of a rifle in terms of front to rear balance, but when you have a rifle that's a foot tall and has a heavy scope, you have to start thinking about it's vertical balance point as well. IMO, this vertical balance point is what makes bullpups feel awkward more than the front to rear balance.One thing some people don't consider is that positioning of weight plays a big role. Forward weight will be a bigger struggle than rearward weight. The most extended arm used to stabilize the barrel will have less work to do if a gun is rear heavy vs front heavy
Isn't that about like a M1 Garand and I thought that was heavy?12 pounds 12.7 ounces lol, unless you're planning on using a bipod or rest forgettaboutit.unless you're strong as %$@#.
View attachment 447098
An M1 is about 9.5 pounds. It's a lightweight in comparison.Isn't that about like a M1 Garand and I thought that was heavy?
Yes, the stack height with scope of some of the bull pups looks like the “super structure“ on a aircraft carrier…I think that one of the biggest factors really comes into play with bullpups, and it's something that has largely been overlooked. Once rifles start to become very tall in terms of the distance from the base of the pistol grip to the top of the optics, they begin to have unusual handling. We're used to thinking of the balance point of a rifle in terms of front to rear balance, but when you have a rifle that's a foot tall and has a heavy scope, you have to start thinking about it's vertical balance point as well. IMO, this vertical balance point is what makes bullpups feel awkward more than the front to rear balance.
Lol, yes! The tripod is the only way though. No way you're holding that gun up for long periods unless you are like Arnold the terminator from the 1990s.I’ll tell y’all like this. After two hours of moving around with this set up, my lower back hurts.
View attachment 535830
You just described my Bulldog.Yes, the stack height with scope of some of the bull pups looks like the “super structure“ on a aircraft carrier…