Sometimes in the process of tuning it is necessary to cut a spring and heat the last coil to collapse the end before flattening. I have seen several posts on here about heat treating after, usually with regard to what to quench in after. Water vs. Oil etc. I would question the validity of doing this.
I say this due largely to the fact that metal is conductive. The idea is to heat, quench and harden the coil you have just collapsed. The reality is if you apply heat at the first blue line in the photo, you are also applying heat to the closest coils of the springdown to the second blue line. Those coils will not be at the ideal temp for hardening, and will be effected by the process. Potentially creating a pattern of hard at the end, a different unknown hardness at the 2nd blue line, and then a return to the factory hardness once at a distance that remained cool enough to be unaffected. Vs an untreated spring that would have a soft/annealed end, tempered at the 2nd blue line. And then returning to factory hardness in the unaffected portion. Which would be a natural progression of increase, and potentially better transition.
I won't ramble on forever before leaving this out for discussion. However, I am a guy who has built my own coal fired blacksmithing forge, and made knives that require heat treat for hardness, and process for tempering to be able to hold an edge without becoming brittle at the apex. My question on this process is rooted in the idea that I would never spot heat treat a knife, and expect good results. You heat the entire blade before the quench to ensure uniformity. To restore proper heat treat in the spring it should be all, or none IMHO.
I say this due largely to the fact that metal is conductive. The idea is to heat, quench and harden the coil you have just collapsed. The reality is if you apply heat at the first blue line in the photo, you are also applying heat to the closest coils of the springdown to the second blue line. Those coils will not be at the ideal temp for hardening, and will be effected by the process. Potentially creating a pattern of hard at the end, a different unknown hardness at the 2nd blue line, and then a return to the factory hardness once at a distance that remained cool enough to be unaffected. Vs an untreated spring that would have a soft/annealed end, tempered at the 2nd blue line. And then returning to factory hardness in the unaffected portion. Which would be a natural progression of increase, and potentially better transition.
I won't ramble on forever before leaving this out for discussion. However, I am a guy who has built my own coal fired blacksmithing forge, and made knives that require heat treat for hardness, and process for tempering to be able to hold an edge without becoming brittle at the apex. My question on this process is rooted in the idea that I would never spot heat treat a knife, and expect good results. You heat the entire blade before the quench to ensure uniformity. To restore proper heat treat in the spring it should be all, or none IMHO.